Notice the common denominator here is choice. However, this too is optional and separate from iCloud in the meaning that you can use all other iCloud services and choose not to use iCloud photos, thus allowing them to sync just as they alway had, albeit through Photos rather than iPhoto since the latter has been deprecated. the new Photos app does change things up a bit and uses a larger bit of bandwidth simply due to uploading / downloading images, which is logical. The only way your devices talk to each other is if you have your device set to sync over WiFi with iTunes. It can use your cellular data depending on your settings of choice. This uses your WiFi primarily and little of it as they're only syncing changes in text in nearly all aspects which is why it's nearly real time. is the apex of all content and that is what each device communicates with independently. Additionally, with Yosemite and iOS8 your devices do not constantly sync with one another but instead with. all show up in the sync page as they always had - as long as they're not syncing with iCloud as you can't have it both ways. It is the default protocol however one can simply choose not use it and your synchronization with iOS and OS X via iTunes 12 is local and the same as it's ever been. Even with the latest of both OS X and iOS software you are not forced to us iCloud. While this might seem a decent argument, most of it is simply untrue. Therefore, your WiFi-band could be sometimes blocked by useless communication (this useless high saturation of WiFi-channels might be one of the reasons for the millions of cut-offs users were complaining using these newer OS). With Mavericks and Yosemite, and IOS 8, your apple-components will without rest try to synchronize with each other. Why to transfer all your data all-around the world and BACK - just to synchronize a second device on the same table in front of you? I am really very happy with it.ĮVERY later released OSX- and IOS-Versions forces you to synchronize via iCloud. With IOS7.1.2 and OSX 10.8.5 everything runs quite perfectly without any problem. ML is the LAST OSX-Version WITH LOCAL SYNCHRONISATION !įor the same reasons, I did NOT upgrade my IOS-Devices (iPhones, iPADs) since IOS7: This is also the LAST IOS-Version that allows you to keep your personal data in-house. So I did.īUT there is one MORE good reason for NOT upgrading higher than 10.8.5: A Professional repairing and selling day-by-day apple-equipment for business-people told me to stay with ML. ĭid not upgrade further because of the Tsunami of bugs and complaints about Maverick and Yosemite. Upgraded 1 year ago both my MBP 2011 and my MacPro 5,1 from the wonderful SL to ML.ĭid not before, because SL ran without ANY problem. And if you would like to use new gestures introduced on 10.7 or later, Better Touch Tool can modify some gesture settings on 10.6.8. Syncing iCal with iPhones works on my 10.6.8 MacBook Pro, although I have to open iCal to download all my new schedules on iPhone. My MacBook Pro is still on 10.6.8, and I managed to get some features available on 10.7 or later. Or you can clone your hard drive onto an external drive, and install 10.8 or 10.10 on that external drive to try out the new OS. If you would like to upgrade, I suggest cloning your hard drive as a back-up. I did not transfer any data from 10.6.8 to 10.9, which led me to believe that using Mavericks as I normally would could have produced more issues. And there were some odd unexplainable issues (sound not working after some time, Safari webpages getting stuck, etc.). However, my MacBook Pro overheated after some time even though I was only running basic apps like Safari, mail and Pages, hence triggering fans to run at 4000+ RPM. I tried Mavericks on my late 2009 MacBook Pro (4gb memory, 2.53 GHz core 2 duo) on a partition, and I was surprised that it ran fine. For example, features like Handoff, SMS, calling and Airdrop are not compatible with 2010 MacBook Pro'. Even if you upgrade to 10.10, you may not get all the advertised features. But it depends on several things - your Mac's spec (CPU, memory, etc.), softwares you have, etc. I don't think you can get Mavericks at this point. If you insist on upgrading, I would suggest Mountain Lion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |